Legal Opinion
Westport Ins. Corp. v. Cotten Schmidt, LLP
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided March 18, 2009No. Civil Action 4:07-CV-664-YPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND STAY
TERRY R„ MEANS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (doc. # 17). Also before the Court is Plaintiffs Response and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. # 20). After review of the motions, the-Court concludes that Westport owes a duty to defend and that the question of the duty to indemnify is not justiciable at this point. The Court, therefore, DENIES Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and GRANTS defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment. The Court also…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Advanced Network, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Evanston Insurance v. MellorsDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2015
- National Cas. Co. v. Franklin County, Miss.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2010
- East Rio Hondo Water Supply Corp. v. American Alternative InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Marshall v. ISMIE Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.