Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Monzel

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 19, 2019No. 16-3108PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Millett, Circuit Judge:

*476 Congress has mandated that those convicted of child pornography offenses pay "full" restitution to their victims for any injuries they "proximate[ly]" caused. 18 U.S.C. § 2259 (2012). That directive recognizes that every perpetrator's viewing of a child's image inflicts distinct harm on that child in that it effects "a repetition of the victim's abuse." See Paroline v. United States , 572 U.S. 434 , 134 S. Ct. 1710 , 1727, 188 L.Ed.2d 714 (2014).

In Paroline , the Supreme Court prescribed a general method and "rough guideposts" for trial courts to follow in determining…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Eduardo Alberto NiezenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Issam Abu-GhoshCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. John MobasseriCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Todd IIIDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API