United States v. Michael Monzel
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Millett, Circuit Judge:
*476 Congress has mandated that those convicted of child pornography offenses pay "full" restitution to their victims for any injuries they "proximate[ly]" caused. 18 U.S.C. § 2259 (2012). That directive recognizes that every perpetrator's viewing of a child's image inflicts distinct harm on that child in that it effects "a repetition of the victim's abuse." See Paroline v. United States , 572 U.S. 434 , 134 S. Ct. 1710 , 1727, 188 L.Ed.2d 714 (2014).
In Paroline , the Supreme Court prescribed a general method and "rough guideposts" for trial courts to follow in determining…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Eduardo Alberto NiezenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Issam Abu-GhoshCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- United States v. John MobasseriCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Todd IIIDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024