Legal Opinion
City of Holland v. Township of Fillmore
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 26, 1961No. Docket 70, Calendar 48,776PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
This is another case in which we are called on to interpret a provision of the annexation statutes. The problem is accurately set forth in the sole stated question as agreed upon by the parties:
“Were the 1958 taxes on property in Fillmore township personal property of the township within the meaning of CLS 1956, § 117.14 (Stat Ann 1959 Cum Supp §5.2093), on August 3, 1958, the date when a portion of Fillmore township was annexed to the city of Holland, thus requiring the money received from the collection of those taxes to be divided between the township of Fillmore and the city of Holland!”
Th…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Township of Royal Oak v. City of BerkleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Township of Dearborn v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Hazel Park Nonpartisan Taxpayers Ass'n v. Township of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- City of Riverview v. City of TrentonMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by10 opinions
- Burkhardt v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Pardee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
- In Re Edgar EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Strawser v. StrawserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Roy v. Detroit Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.