Legal Opinion

Microchip Technology Inc. v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 31, 2012No. 1 CA-TX 11-0001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWANN, Judge.

¶ 1 Microchip Technology Inc. (“Taxpayer”) appeals from a summary judgment. The tax court ruled that Taxpayer’s sewer systems and storm basins failed to qualify for the pollution-control income-tax credit, codified at A.R.S. § 43-1170. We hold that the tax court erred when it concluded that § 43-1170(B), which describes what property is “included” in the credit, limits the broader language of § 43-1170(A). We therefore reverse and remand.

*305 FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Taxpayer manufactures semiconductors at plants in Tempe and Chandler. Between 2000 and 2001, Taxpayer…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Wilderness World, Inc. v. Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Joy P. Adams Roger D. Wensil v. Elizabeth H. Dole, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Energy, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arizona State University ex rel. Arizona Board of Regents v. Arizona State Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  2. Ruben v. AmbCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API