Arizona State University ex rel. Arizona Board of Regents v. Arizona State Retirement System
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORRIS, Judge:
¶ 1 The dispositive question in this appeal is whether Defendant/Appellee, the Arizona State Retirement System, was required to follow the rulemaking procedure set forth in Arizona’s Administrative Procedure Act before enforcing a policy under which it charged Plaintiff/Appellant, Arizona State University, for an actuarial unfunded liability reportedly arising when 17 University employees retired. We hold that it was, and because the System failed to follow the rule-*248making procedure, the policy is invalid. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the superior court for entry…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Valdes v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- City of Sacramento v. Public Employees Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Forsythe v. PaschalArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Cochise County v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arizona State University Board of Regents v. Arizona State Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- BSI Holdings, LLC v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Lagerman v. AsrsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Bsi v. AdotCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- REPUBLICAN NATL COMMITTEE v. FONTESArizona Supreme Court · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.