Legal Opinion

Union & New Haven Trust Co. v. Osterweis

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided September 28, 1940No. File 56409PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinlan, J.

Because of the number of claimants and the multiplicity of legal questions caused thereby, it became desirable to procure a transcript of the proceedings before the court held the last Friday in June. Due to vacations this transcript was not procurable from the stenographer’s office until the latter part of August, and hence the postponement in decision.

None of the parties filed a remonstrance and out of the conflicting claims I have endeavored to resolve the conclusions based on the committee’s report. Under section 176 of the Practice Book (1934) the court, in the absence of a remonstrance,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hempstead v. Meadville Theological SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Bridgeport-City Trust Co. v. BeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. New Haven Sand Blast Co. v. DreisbachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  4. H. G. Craig & Co. v. Uncas Paperboard Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  5. Carter v. BrownellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  2. Iroquois Gas Trans. Sys. v. Zuckerman, No. Cv91 036631s (Mar. 31, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
  3. Palmer v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API