Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Director of Agriculture v. Paramount Citrus Assn., Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 2, 1957No. Civ. 21587PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This action is one prosecuted by the attorney general under the provisions of division 6, chapter 10, of the Agricultural Code, and particularly section 1300.19 thereof, and upon the complaint of the Director of Agriculture.
Pursuant to the relevant provisions of the Agricultural Code, the Director of Agriculture issued a marketing order effective October 1, 1954, requiring processors of lemon products to place 75 per cent of all their lemons received for processing during the 1954-1955 marketing season in the “Stabilization Pool” and to be there subject to the control of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Board of Dry Cleaners v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Strudthoff v. YatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Blake v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Stewart v. Superior Court of San Diego Cty.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Diederichsen v. SutchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Connolly Development, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Gold v. Los Angeles Democratic LeagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. Coit Ranch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Kleist v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.