Legal Opinion
In re Aquila Erisa Litigation
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided July 18, 2006No. 04-00865CV-W-DWPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WHIPPLE, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (Doc. 38). Defendants filed Suggestions in Opposition (Doc. 77) and Plaintiffs submitted Reply Suggestions (Doc. 88). Plaintiffs submitted a Supplement to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (Doe. 93) and Defendants were permitted to respond (Doc. 100). A hearing on the motion was held on May 25, 2006. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion is GRANTED IN PART.
I. Background
At issue in this ease is the Aquila Retirement Investment Plan (the “Plan”), an ERISA plan maintained by Aquila, Inc.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re Schering Plough Corp. Erisa LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Kanawi v. Bechtel Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Tatum v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Jones v. NovaStar Financial, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2009
- In re First American Corp. Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.