Legal Opinion

Van Alen v. Rogers

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1800PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This was an action of trespass, brought for the recovery ' of the mesne profits of a lot of land, with a store-house and ■other buildings thereon, situate in the county of Columbia. • The cause was tried before Mr. Justice Lewis, at a circuit held in the county of Columbia, on the 30th October, 1799. The plea, was not guilty, with a notice subjoined to .the folló wing, effect; “that in support of the plea, the défendant, upon the trial, would give .in evidence that the…

Read the full summary

This was an action of trespass, brought for the recovery ' of the mesne profits of a lot of land, with a store-house and ■other buildings thereon, situate in the county of Columbia. • The cause was tried before Mr. Justice Lewis, at a circuit held in the county of Columbia, on the 30th October, 1799. The plea, was not guilty, with a notice subjoined to .the folló wing, effect; “that in support of the plea, the défendant, upon the trial, would give .in evidence that the plaintiff derived title to the premises from one Lowrens:Van Alen, deceased, and as a devisee under the last will-and…

1Per curiam

The first objection to the plaintiff’s recovery rests ón a matter of form, arising from the fictitious proceedings in ejectment. That action, in practice, is confined ■to the trial of the title only. The damages are nominal, and are not given in satisfaction of the mesne profits which have long been the subject-óf a distinct action.(a) They are ne*340cessary only to entitle the plaintiff to recover costs, and certainly cannot preclude him from a recovery of the mesne profits any more than the entry oí a. remit tur upon a judgment by default against the casual ejector. The latter is an express…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chirac v. ReinickerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Miller v. ShacklefordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1835
  3. Coxe v. JoinerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1814
  4. Fenn v. StilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1792

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York Ontario & Western Railway Co. v. LivingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API