Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Davis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1991No. 25 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1989PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE

FLAHERTY *, Justice.

In this appeal we reconsider the due process requirements pertaining to juvenile proceedings.

*430On May 6, 1985, the appellee, Harvey Davis, a juvenile, was adjudicated a delinquent by the late Honorable Wilhelm F. Knauer, Jr., on a charge of behavior constituting simple assault. Judge Knauer placed Davis on probation with the condition that he return to school without absences, lateness, or suspensions, and directed his probation officer to file a motion for unsatisfactory probation should Davis have more than two unexcused absences from school.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Cominsky v. DonovanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. ScherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. In the Interest of DixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API