Cominsky v. Donovan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
¶ 1 We decide whether the trial court erred in admitting lay witness testimony about the pain and suffering experienced by someone in a persistent vegetative state. We reverse and remand for a new trial on damages only.
¶ 2 Plaintiff-appellee Seymour Comin-sky1 filed this action on behalf of himself and the Estate of Pearl Cominsky, his wife, against defendant-appellant Holy Redeemer Health System, alleging that the appellant’s negligence during post-operative care caused Pearl’s brain injury and ultimate death. Appellee presented evidence that, as a result of the negligence of appellant’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CountermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Lewis v. MellorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Scattaregia v. Shin Shen WuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Collins v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Travellers Insurance v. Heppenstall Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harris v. NGK North American, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Bada, J. v. Comcast CorporationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Com. v. Altawarh, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Com. v. Ellison, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Com. v. Sanchez, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.