Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Dixon

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

On June 15, 1994, Kimani Jaja Dixon was adjudicated delinquent, based on charges of aggravated assault and recklessly endangering another person. These charges arose from Dixon’s alleged firing of several shots into a van operated by Angel Penzort in the City of Lancaster on the evening of April 28, 1994. A dispositional hearing was held on July 5,1994, and Dixon was ordered committed to a secure juvenile facility, subject to review in six months, and to make restitution and pay the costs of prosecution. On direct appeal, Dixon argues that the juvenile court erred by unduly…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. BuehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MullinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. MullinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. In the Interest of: B.C.H., a MinorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API