City of Seattle v. Proctor

-The respondent was convicted in the police court of the city of Seattle of a violation of 3, 4(a) and 4(b) of ordinance No. 43475 of that city as amended by ordinance No. 51632. He appealed to the superior court of King county and, before trial, interposed a demurrer to the complaint, which was sustained by the trial court, and a judgment entered dismissing the action. The city appeals.

The sections of the ordinance under which the respondent was charged- follow:

“Section 3. It shall be unlawful to advertise any, goods, wares, or merchandise, securities, service, real estate or any other thing…