Legal Opinion
Serxner v. Elgart
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1949PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLivingston, J.
In an action to enjoin the defendant from committing certain acts of trespass and for damages as a result thereof, plaintiff moves for an order pursuant to rule 109 of the Eules of Civil Practice strildng out the two separate defenses and counterclaims interposed by the defendant on the grounds that they do not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and are barred by reason of res judicata and lack of jurisdiction, of the subject matter by the court.
An examination of the defenses and counterclaims indicates the following: The defendant, in substance, alleges in the first *1055defens…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hauser v. BartowNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Dean v. . KochendorferNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Paul v. FargoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Sachs v. WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Assets Collecting Co. v. MyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Luckett v. CohenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Atwood v. KerlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Montalbano v. De LuzioAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1963
- Rappaport v. RappaportNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Keith v. WeinbergNew York Supreme Court · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.