Legal Opinion

Montalbano v. De Luzio

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 23, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The determination of the City Rent and Rehabilitation Administration, based upon a physical inspection, as to the number of rooms occupied by the tenants was binding upon the trial court. (City Rent, Eviction and Rehabilitation Regulations, § 36, subd. a; Barbee v. 2639 Corp., 284 App. Div. 298; Serxner v. Elgart, 196 Misc. 1053, 1056.) The maximum rent could be increased only by order of the Administrator and not the court. (Seidenberg v. Cavanagh, 204 Misc. 235; Ivanovsky v. Paladino, 115 N. Y. S. 2d 596; Friedman v. Carr, *835115 N. Y. S. 2d 519.) The method prescribed in section 8 of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barbee v. 2639 Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Serxner v. ElgartNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Seidenberg v. CavanaghAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Raynes Associates Ltd. Partnership v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Rental & Management Associates Corp. v. GossinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API