Luckett v. Cohen
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff suing as assignee on a promissory note made by defendant moves to dismiss the first and second counterclaims pleaded in the answer on the ground that they are insufficient in law.
Jurisdiction is predicated on diversity; the sufficiency of the claims is to be tested by New York law. The note sued upon is alleged to have been executed and delivered in Mexico. There has been no arrest of the person of defendant or seizure or similar process with respect to his property. The second counterclaim which pleads a transaction had with plaintiff’s assignor may be asserted…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hauser v. BartowNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Halberstadt v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Doyle v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Green v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Horwitz v. SpragueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Atwood v. KerlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957