Loesel v. City of Frankenmuth
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW TRIAL OR REMITTITUR; GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART, AND SCHEDULING FOR EVIDENTIA-RY HEARING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES, INTEREST, AND COSTS; SCHEDULING TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE; AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Ronald and Arthur Loesel filed a complaint against Defendant City of Frankenmuth on March 17, 2008. The Loesels are owners of a tract of land on the northern outskirts of…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ronald Loesel v. City of FrankenmuthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Scheffler v. LeeDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020