Legal Opinion

Loesel v. City of Frankenmuth

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 27, 2010No. Case 08-11131-BCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW TRIAL OR REMITTITUR; GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART, AND SCHEDULING FOR EVIDENTIA-RY HEARING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES, INTEREST, AND COSTS; SCHEDULING TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE; AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Ronald and Arthur Loesel filed a complaint against Defendant City of Frankenmuth on March 17, 2008. The Loesels are owners of a tract of land on the northern outskirts of…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ronald Loesel v. City of FrankenmuthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Scheffler v. LeeDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API