Legal Opinion

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Gross

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1985No. D.D. No. 84-47PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Dayton Bar Association has advocated throughout this entire proceeding that respondent be permanently disbarred. Relator characterizes respondent as “unremorseful” and “beyond rehabilitation” and his conduct as intentional, fraudulent, and egregious. Respondent has offered numerous defenses and excuses for his conduct, insisting that a minimal penalty be imposed. We have carefully reviewed the record and find respondent’s arguments without merit. For the following reasons, we adopt the findings of the board. However, unlike the board, we agree with the relator that respondent should be…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Butler County Bar Ass'n v. GreenOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Akron Bar Ass'n v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. FennellOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. TuttleOhio Supreme Court · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lorenz v. Air Illinois, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API