Legal Opinion

Weinberg v. Barry

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 14, 1986No. Civ. A. 83-2701PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

OBERDORFER, District Judge.

I

Plaintiffs in this action are trustees for the beneficial owners of a building in downtown Washington, D.C., known as the Warner Building, which is currently maintained as a combination theater and office building. Defendants are the Mayor of the District of Columbia, the Joint Committee on Landmarks of the National Capital (Joint Committee), and the District of Columbia Historic Preservation Review Board (Review Board). Intervenor is the D.C. Preservation League, a non-profit corporation dedicated to the preservation of District of Columbia landmarks.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. MacIo SingletonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Donnelly Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. District of Columbia Historic Preservation Review BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Sameric Corp. of Chestnut St., Inc. v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API