Legal Opinion

Sameric Corp. of Chestnut St., Inc. v. City of Philadelphia

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 1989No. Appeals 1277 C.D. 1987 and 1985 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

Sameric Corporation (Sameric) is the owner of a motion picture theatre in downtown Philadelphia. It appeals the Philadelphia County Common Pleas Court orders which dismissed its challenge to a Philadelphia Historical Commission (Commission) decision 1 and denied post- trial relief. This is a case of first impression in this Commonwealth.

The Commission held public hearings and concluded that Samerics Boyd Theatre merited historic designation. The Commission found that the building was the work of a prominent Philadelphia architectural firm and that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. City of Pittsburgh v. Royston Service, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Kujawa v. City of WilliamsportCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Pedersen v. South Williamsport Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Weinberg v. BarryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sameric Corporation Of Delaware, Inc. v. City Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. United Artists' Theater Circuit, Inc. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Sameric Corp of DE v. Cty of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. United Artists' Theater Circuit, Inc. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API