Hawaii Longline Association v. National Marine Fisheries Serv.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
This is the second time that the Court has been presented with cross-motions for summary judgment during the unusual procedural history of this APA litigation. Plaintiff Hawaii Longline Association’s (“HLA’s”) 1 Second Amended Complaint seeks to set aside regulations and a biological opinion issued by Defendants National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) and Secretary Donald L. Evans affecting the Fishery Management Plan for the Western Pacific Region. Specifically, HLA has moved for summary judgment regarding its second claim for relief, which…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Shays v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Hawaii Longline Ass'n v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Hornbeck Offshore Transportation, LLC v. United States Coast GuardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Shays v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.