Legal Opinion

Adams v. Robertson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 3, 1997No. 95-1873PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama to decide whether the Alabama courts’ approval of the class action and the settlement agreement in this case, without affording all class members the right to exclude themselves from the class or the agreement, violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Alabama Supreme Court did not address this federal issue, and it is now apparent that petitioners have failed to establish that they properly presented the issue to that court. We therefore dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

I — <

In 1992,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Nitro-Lift Technologies, L. L. C. v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Campbell v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Lonnie Weeks, Jr. v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  4. Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Cook v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API