Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Byrne

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 20, 1989No. 13-88-431-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

Michael Snyder brought suit against ap-pellee Roger Byrne, alleging illegal use of judicial process. The trial court, pursuant to the jury answers, ordered that Snyder take nothing from his suit. By six points of error Snyder complains of jury misconduct, the jury charge, and factual insufficiency of the evidence.

Michael Snyder, representing Snyder Contracting Limited (Limited), entered into construction agreements with Drs. Byrne and Coniglio regarding construction of the Dental Speciality Center Condominum. As Limited worked on the foundation, it received, per draw…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Castleberry v. BranscumTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Watson v. PrewittTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Martin v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Icard, Merrill, Cullis, Timm, Furen & Ginsburg, P.A.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Rosen v. Tesoro Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. F & a Equipment Leasing, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  4. Rose v. First American Title Insurance Co. of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
  5. Ortiz v. Ford Motor Credit Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API