Ortiz v. Ford Motor Credit Co.

OPINION

DORSEY, Justice.

Appellants complain of a take-nothing judgment rendered after a jury trial in this personal injury action. The suit arose out of personal injuries allegedly sustained by Ramon Ortiz and his family members when Doug MeCool, acting as an agent of Ford Motor Credit, repossessed a pick-up truck leased by Ortiz. By five points of error, appellants’ complaints concern juror challenges, jury misconduct, sufficiency of the evidence, and the court’s admission of certain evidence. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

By point of error one, appellants maintain that the trial…