Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gallagher v. Cleveland Browns Football Co., Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1994No. 63311Published

1DissentDonald C. Nugent, Judge

Because I believe the defendants-appellants, Cleveland Browns Football Company, Inc., Cleveland Browns, Inc. and Cleveland Stadium Corporation, Inc., have waived their right to assert the defense of primary assumption of risk, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to reverse the jury verdict finding in favor of plaintiffs-appellees, Michael Gallagher and Northbrook Property and Casualty Insurance Co.

Under the unique procedural circumstances presented by the case sub judice, I conclude that the appellants waived their right to assert the defense of primary assumption of risk by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Thompson v. McNeillOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Marchetti v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hoover v. SumlinOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Villella v. Waikem Motors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API