Legal Opinion

Soto v. United States

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 24, 1990No. CV 86-2509 AWTPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

TASHIMA, District Judge.

This is an action arising under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b) & 2671 et seq., and was tried to the court on liability only. This Memorandum Decision constitutes the court’s findings of facts and conclusions of law under F.R.Civ.P. 52(a) on those issues.

FACTS

On August 13, 1983, plaintiff, together with a number of his family members and friends went to the Angeles National Forest for a day outing. 1 They went to the Big Tujunga Canyon area of the national forest, which is a part of the Tujunga Ranger District (the District…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Kendra Summers, a Minor, and Frederick J. Summers, Guardian Ad Litem v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Sorensen v. AllredCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Morgan v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Manuel v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Weaver v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
  3. Nelson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2017
  4. Figueroa v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API