Legal Opinion

Mathews Piano Co. v. Markle

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1910No. 15,920PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Gage county: John B. Raper, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

This is a replevin action brought by the Mathews Piano Company against H. E. Markle as defendant to recover *124possession of a piano. Before the trial John H. Penner intervened and answered, alleging that he was the owner of the property. Markle made no appearance. The case Avas tried to the court Avithout a jury, and judgment Avas rendered for the intervener Penner. From this' judgment the plaintiff appeals.

The evidence sIioavs that in the latter part of December, 1908, H. E. Markle Avas conducting a hotel in the city of Beatrice; that about this time Markle borroAved |5,500 from Penner. Penner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Negaubauer v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  2. Van Winkle v. CrowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Richards v. Schreiber, Conchar & Westphal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. Fredrickson v. SchmittrothNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Winton Motor Carriage Co. v. Broadway Automobile Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Ross P. Curtice Co. v. Estate of JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Kimball v. CooperNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Klinefelter v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Francis v. BohartOregon Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API