Legal Opinion

State v. Ronk

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 5, 1904No. Nos. 13,707 — (21)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal by defendant from' an order of the district court for Faribault county, Quinn, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial and conviction of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

Bert Ronk was accused of the crime of murder in the second degree in ■an indictment charging, with appropriate averments of scienter, that he shot and killed Charles Eberlein, at Brush Creek, on March 17,'1903. He was brought to trial at the June term of the Faribault county district court for that year, and convicted of manslaughter in the first degree. Upon a bill of exceptions settled by the trial court, there was a motion for a new trial, which was overruled. From this order, defendant appeals.

The bill of exceptions does not contain all the evidence or proceedings, but such portions only…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. State v. HaywardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
  4. Sherman v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. DeZelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. State v. KeatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. State v. CurrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Lesch v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API