Legal Opinion
In re the New York City Transit Authority
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edwin Kassoff, J.
In this condemnation proceeding, claimants, Malto Realty Corporation and Superior Reed & Rattan Furniture Company, move for an additional allowance pursuant to EDPL 701. By order of this court dated July 22, 1988, claimants’ initial motion for the same relief was denied. Claimants appealed the judgment and order in this case. On appeal the Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed the judgment of this court as to the underlying condemnation award and reversed the order denying claimants’ motion for fees pursuant to EDPL 701. The Appellate Division…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the New York Transit AuhorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Gordon v. Town of EsopusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re the New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- Karas v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Frisbro Enterprises, Ltd. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hoffman v. Town of MaltaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Long Beach v. Sun NLF Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Village of Port ChesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.