Legal Opinion

State v. Quint

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 7, 1902No. 13,037PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Ellis district court; Lee Monroe, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cunningham, J.:

This was an action charging the defendant with the misdemeanor of resisting an officer in the service of a writ of' attachment. The officer was a deputy sheriff. The defense was that the appointment and oath of office of such deputy were not filed in the office of the county clerk as provided by-section 1745 of the General Statutes of 1901. It is *145contended that until such appointment and oath are so filed the deputy is no officer, is not authorized to serve process, and may be resisted in such service. In this case, the officer acting as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weatherford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  2. State v. DierbergerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. People v. CradlebaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. Orchard v. PeakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Pattison v. Hogston, Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API