Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pattison v. Hogston, Admr.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1927No. 12,807Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

Nichols, J.

I must respectfully dissent from the opinion of the majority so far as it holds that the regular judge, after a change had- been taken from him because of his bias and prejudice, and a special judge had been appointed, was authorized to modify the order of sale rendered by the special judge. It does not appear that the special judge had declined to act, nor does it appear that there had been any consent that the cause might be remanded to the jurisdiction of the regular judge. It is my opinion that such regular judge was wholly without jurisdiction to make such…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Whitesell v. StricklerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Horton v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Case v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Carr v. DuhmeIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API