Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 27, 1933No. 4-2931PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

This action was instituted by appellant to recover from appellee surety company for premiums due upon liability policies issued to the contractor, who had given a bond to the Highway Commission with the appellee as surety on said bond.

The Yellville Construction Company entered into a contract with the State Highway Commission for the construction of approximately twelve miles of grading and drainage on one of the Arkansas highways. On the same day it entered into the contract with the Highway Commission, it made a bond in conformity with act 368 of the Acts of the General Assembly for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Crawford v. Ozark InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Blyth-Farco Co. v. FreeUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Zellars v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  5. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. Yaffe Iron & Metal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carter v. Saint Paul Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1968
  2. Pittsburgh v. Parkview Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Sheffield v. HeslepSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  4. Empire Life & Hospital Insurance v. Armorel Planting Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Anderson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API