Pittsburgh v. Parkview Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Stern,
This action is to recover on two instruments, one a labor and materialmen’s bond, the other a performance bond, executed by Parkview Construction Company, Inc. as principal and Continental Casualty Company as surety, the obligee being the City of Pittsburgh. The Construction Company entered into a contract with the City to do certain repaving work; the contract required the furnishing of these bonds. The condition of the labor and materialmen’s bond was that “if said principal and all sub-contractors to whom any portion of the work provided for in said contract is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Greene County v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- McClelland v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Southern Surety Co. v. Metropolitan Sewerage CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Building Contractors' Ltd. Mutual Liability Insurance v. Southern Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Frommeyer v. L. & R. CONSTRUCTION CO.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1956
- Pennsylvania Supply Co. v. National Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Peter J. Mascaro Co. v. MilonasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Williams v. Paxson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Commonwealth v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.