Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh v. Parkview Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1942No. Appeal, 152PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

This action is to recover on two instruments, one a labor and materialmen’s bond, the other a performance bond, executed by Parkview Construction Company, Inc. as principal and Continental Casualty Company as surety, the obligee being the City of Pittsburgh. The Construction Company entered into a contract with the City to do certain repaving work; the contract required the furnishing of these bonds. The condition of the labor and materialmen’s bond was that “if said principal and all sub-contractors to whom any portion of the work provided for in said contract is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Greene County v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. McClelland v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Southern Surety Co. v. Metropolitan Sewerage CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Building Contractors' Ltd. Mutual Liability Insurance v. Southern Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Frommeyer v. L. & R. CONSTRUCTION CO.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1956
  2. Pennsylvania Supply Co. v. National Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Peter J. Mascaro Co. v. MilonasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Williams v. Paxson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Commonwealth v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API