Legal Opinion

Carter v. Saint Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided April 26, 1968No. LR 67 C 76, LR 67 C 134, PB 67 C 59PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

YOUNG, District Judge.

These three cases involve the construction and legality of clauses which restrict or reduce liability of insurance carriers in uninsured motorist provisions of the policies.

In one of the cases the insurance policy excludes by definition from uninsured motorist coverage a certain category of motor vehicles. In the other two cases the insurance policies provide that the insurance companies may deduct from the policy limits any amounts received by the insureds through workmen’s compensation payments.

This Court has jurisdiction of these cases by reason of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sellers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1966
  2. Bryant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  3. Peterson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Mission Insurance v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Standard Accident Insurance Company v. GavinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Geyer v. Reserve Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. Travelers Insurance v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Glen R. Vaught v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  5. Brunmeier v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API