Legal Opinion

Byron Milton Wilburn v. Warden L. S. Nelson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 2, 1972No. 71-1135PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, a California prisoner, applied for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that he was denied due process by the failure of the California Adult Authority to provide him with assistance of counsel at his parole revocation hearing. The district court granted the writ 323 F.Supp. 585. The Warden appealed.

It is the position of this court that as a general rule assistance of counsel is not an essential element of due process in such a proceeding because “alternatives adequate in point of fairness may well exist in routine cases.” The ultimate test in each case is “whether the procedures…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. David Anthony Dennis, Sr. v. California Adult Authority, the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  2. Ellhamer v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. Wilburn v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Charles G. M'clary v. California Adult Authority, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  2. Ernest Mays, Jr. v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden, San Quentin PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  3. Anderson v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
  4. Donald Edward Mozingo v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, Folsom State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API