Legal Opinion
Ellhamer v. Wilson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 7, 1971No. Nos. 25919, 25953PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
The orders granting writs of habeas corpus to Ellhamer and Hinnington, California state prisoners, are reversed. The district court will enter orders denying the writs.
We are asked to overrule our cases which have upheld California in not providing counsel on parole revocation hearings. This we decline to do. See High Pine v. Montana, 9 Cir., 439 F.2d 1093; Lincoln v. California Adult Authority, 9 Cir., 435 F.2d 133; Mead v. California Adult Authority, 9 Cir., 415 F.2d 767.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- John Lyle Mead v. California Adult AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Abe Lincoln v. The California Adult AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Larry P. High Pine v. The State of Montana and W. J. Estelle, Jr., Warden of Montana State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robert Dorado, on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Henry W. Kerr, Chairman, California Adult Authority, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- David Anthony Dennis, Sr. v. California Adult Authority, the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States of America Ex Rel. Jose Mario Martinez v. Noah L. AlldredgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Byron Milton Wilburn v. Warden L. S. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Mozingo v. CravenDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.