Legal Opinion
Ernest Mays, Jr. v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden, San Quentin Prison
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 1, 1972No. 71-1655PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The district court granted appellee’s petition for habeas corpus, holding that in the circumstances of this case he was entitled to assistance of counsel in proceedings that resulted in the revocation of his parole by the California Adult Authority.
The district court pointed out (1) that erroneous information was submitted to the Board regarding the offense with which appellee had been charged, and (2) that verification of certain facts relevant to whether parole should have been revoked was available but was not received by the Adult Authority. Mays v. Nelson, 323 F.Supp. 587, 588-589 (N.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Bearden v. South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- David Anthony Dennis, Sr. v. California Adult Authority, the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Charles G. M'clary v. California Adult Authority, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Charles G. M'clary v. California Adult Authority, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Jesse Lee Griffin v. California Adult Authority, L. S. Nelson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Anderson v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
- California Adult Authority v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ernest Mays, Jr. v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden, San Quentin PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973