Legal Opinion

Moore v. Boyd

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1884No. 10,011PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

Appellees sued appellants upon two promissory notes. Appellants answered in eight paragraphs. The first three were limited to the first paragraph of the complaint, and consisted of payment, want of consideration, and usury. The other five paragraphs, except the fifth, which was general, were to the second paragraph of the complaint, and all of them, except the fourth,’pleaded usury. The fourth pleaded a want of consideration as to a part of the note.

A demurrer was sustained to the third, fourth and. eighth *135paragraphs of the answer, and overruled as to the others, except the fifth,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Webster v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Manly v. HubbardIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Landwerlen v. WheelerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Washington Hotel Realty Co. v. Bedford Stone & Construction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Rush v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Fisher v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Zebold v. HurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API