Legal Opinion
Ruskin v. Safir
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Louis B. York, J.
This is a motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to suppress under CPLR 4506 certain testimony at an administrative hearing. Because the court finds that the conditions for obtaining such a preliminary injunction have been met, the court grants the motion.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Howard Ruskin, a detective of the New York City Police Department for the past eight years and a member of that Department for over 15 years, is currently the object of Police Department disciplinary proceedings seeking severe sanctions up to and including expulsion. An…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Finn's Liquor Shop, Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- United States Mortgage & Trust Co. v. RugglesNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- People v. LiberatoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. CapolongoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- In re the Accounting of Bank of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ruskin v. SafirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Ruskin v. SafirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Doe v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 2010