Legal Opinion
Natoli v. Sullivan
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 14, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert G. Hurlbutt, J.
Defendant Thomson Publications of New York, Inc., doing business as The Palladium Times, made a preanswer motion for dismissal of the complaint on the basis that it does not state a claim against defendant upon which relief can be granted (CPLR 3211 [a] [7]). Defendants The Oswegonian, Maravi and Schreiner then moved for summary judgment, also citing CPLR 3211 (a) (7).
The complaint alleges that defendant Earhart, with the aid and complicity of defendants Sullivan and Rappaport, did eavesdrop and illegally intercept and record private telephonic…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Landmark Communications, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Florida Star v. B. J. F.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peavy v. HarmanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1999
- Peavy v. New Times, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1997
- Natoli v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Natoli v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994