State ex rel. Tinglestad v. Nye
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon the relation of Edward Tinglestad, this court granted its writ of certiorari directed to the judges of the Seventh judicial district to review the decision of Parsons, J., in a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act brought by relator, as employee, against John Lauritzen, as employer.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
Certiomri to review the order of the district court in a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act denying the relator’s motion to allow him to file a new complaint.
The relator was injured on October 30, 1913. He was paid on the basis of full disability for the period of 18 weeks from November 13, 1913, to March 19, 1914. On April 16, 1914, a summons was issued and a complaint was served claiming total disability. On July 11, 1914, the *51court made its findings and conclusions. It found that the relator was totally disabled from October 30, 1913, to June 11, 1914, a period of 33…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Klemer v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Alabama By-Products Corporation v. WintersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Zinken v. Melrose Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Jenkins v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Harmon v. J. H. Wiese Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1931