Legal Opinion

Humphrey Oil Corporation v. Lindsey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 10, 1961No. 39179PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

This appeal by petition in error with case made attached presents a frequently recurring and perplexing jurisdictional question. The trial court, though extending the time to make and serve case made, did not effectively extend the time to appeal to this court until more than three months after the or der overruling motion for new trial. 12 O.S.1951 § 972, as amended in 1955 (12 O.S.Supp.1959, § 972); City of Cleveland v. Hambright, Okl., 320 P.2d 388.

After the appeal was filed in this court the defendant in error, Lindsey, filed a motion to dismiss for the above-mentioned…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stevens Expert Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Mabry v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Marker v. GillamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. KitchenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. City of Cleveland v. HambrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stork v. StorkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Isaacson Structural Steel Co. v. Armco Steel Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Chandler v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Reed v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Cartwright v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co. of Columbia, MissouriSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API