Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Hambright

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 4, 1957No. 37748PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

A motion to dismiss has been filed by defendant in error for the reason that the appeal was not filed in this court within the time provided by law.

The appeal was filed more than three months after the order overruling the motion for a new trial.

Under the provisions of 12 O.S.1951 § 972, an appeal by case-made must be filed in the Supreme Court within three months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of unless the trial court extends the period of time.

The three months expired March 10, 1957. There was clearly no express extension of time within which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams v. HobbsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Roof v. FechtelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Sheets v. SheetsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Auto Convoy Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Humphrey Oil Corporation v. LindseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Auto Convoy Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Auto Convoy Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Champion Building Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API