Legal Opinion

Gobbi v. Refrano

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1898PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Multnomah : Alfred F. Sears, Judge. Action by Barney Gobbi against M. Refrano for $213, wherein plaintiff had judgment in the justice’s court for $170. On appeal plaintiff liad, judgment for $54, which was paid. Plaintiff appeals from certain rulings which are fully set forth in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

The plaintiff recovered a judgment in a justice’s court, from which the defendant appealed to the circuit court by serving and filing his notice of appeal and undertaking in due form, within the time required by law. Exceptions having been filed to the sufficiency of the surety on the undertaking, the defendant gave notice that he would produce him before the justice on a day named to justify, but failed, owing to a mistake of his counsel. He thereafer filed a transcript in the circuit court, and applied to that court on motion, supported by an affidavit, for leave to file a new undertaking…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Odell v. GotfreyOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Jenkins v. MerriweatherIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Hughes v. ClemensOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Hosford v. LogusOregon Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eareckson v. ChandlerOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Todd v. BighamOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Hulegaard v. GarrettOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Loussac v. JacobsenDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1927
  5. State Ex Rel. Brindjonc v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API