Legal Opinion

White v. Amenta

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 6, 1930PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

The trial court has found the following facts: On October 7th, 1927, an automobile owned by the defendant Antonio Amenta was in collision with one owned and operated by the plaintiff. The plaintiff did not, between that day and December 30th, 1927, inclusive, make any claim to the defendant for damages arising out of the collision. In 1917 the defendant Antonio had owned a certain piece of real estate which he in that year transferred to his wife, the other defendant, Sebastiana Amenta; in 1924 she transferred it back to him and on October 7th, 1927, he owned it. On December 30th, 1927, he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fox v. HillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1815
  2. Defeo v. HindingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  3. Wilson v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mims v. MimsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Molitor v. MolitorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Whitney v. WhitneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  5. Murphy v. DantowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API