Legal Opinion
Hernandez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided June 4, 2003No. 2053-01Published
1Opinion of the Court
116 S.W.3d 26 (2003)
Arturo Chavez HERNANDEZ, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas.
No. 2053-01.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
June 4, 2003.
Guy Williams, Corpus Christi, for Appellant.
Jeffrey L. Van Horn, First Asst. State Atty., Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for State.
Before the court en banc.
OPINION
2Per curiam
The present case involves the admissibility of scientific evidence under Texas Rule of Evidence 702 and Kelly v. State.[1] Specifically, we granted the State's following three grounds for review:
1) Must a party seeking to introduce evidence of a scientific principle always present…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Keller; Concurrence · Johnson.
3Cases cited86 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.