Legal Opinion

Walston v. W. H. Applewhite & Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 25, 1953No. 234PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.

We have set out the pleadings and the evidence rather fully in our statement of facts for the reason we are unable 'to reconcile them with certain contentions argued in the respective briefs.

It will be observed that the plaintiffs do not allege in their complaint that the 5.9-acre tract of land, which they allege is owned in fee by Charles Walston, is subject to the dower of Mrs. Jeanette Day. Yet in their brief they do so contend. On the other band, the defendant contends in its brief, that Charles Walston’s tract of land is not subject to the dower of Mrs. Jeanette-Day, and alleges in its…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Eason v. SpenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Harris v. . BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Powell v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Craddock v. . BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Weir v. . WeirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Leary v. N.C. Forest Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Henderson County v. OsteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Taylor v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Sledge v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Kennedy v. WhaleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API