Legal Opinion
Weinstein v. Siemens
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 22, 2010No. Case 2:07-CV-15000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING SIEMENS’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE NOS. 1-15 TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN WRITTEN STATEMENTS BY VARIOUS SIEMENS EMPLOYEES (DKT. NOS. 61-75)
PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Siemens, fka UGS Corp.’s (“Sie mens”) Motions in Limine Nos. 4-15 To Exclude Certain Written Statements by Various Siemens Employees. (Dkt. Nos. 64-75.) Plaintiff has filed responses (Dkt. Nos. 92-99, 103-106) and Siemens has filed replies (Dkt. Nos. 136-147.) The Court held a hearing on November 18, 2010. For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Siemens’ motions in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. AmmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Crowley v. L.L. Bean, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Benjamin Blackburn v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Patricia KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. D.G. Seago, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davis v. Echo Valley Condo. Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- BRYANT-LIPP v. SENIOR LIVING WINDERMERE, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022
- Carden v. McDonough (TV1)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2022