Legal Opinion

Steinmetz v. Versailles & Osgood Turnpike Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Erom the Eipley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

"Worden, J.

This was an action by the appellee, against the appellant, to recover the amount of one hundred dollars, subscribed by the defendant to the preliminary articles of the plaintiff’s association.

Demurrer to the complaint, for want of sufficient facts, overruled, and exception.

The defendant answered in five paragraphs. The first, which we suppose was the general denial, was withdrawn. A demurrer was sustained to each of the other paragraphs, and there was final judgment for the plaintiff.

We proceed to consider the points made in the brief of counsel for the appellant.

• The complaint…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Wild Cat Gravel Road Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Johnson v. Crawfordsville, Frankfort, Kokomo, & Fort Wayne RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Covington, Coal-Creek, & Jacksonville Plank-Road Co. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gulp, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. State ex rel. Dithmar v. BunnellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. State v. BuralliNevada Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Columbian Oil Co. v. BlakeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Beckner v. Riverside & Battle Ground Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API