Legal Opinion

Columbian Oil Co. v. Blake

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1895No. 1,683PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Blackford Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This was an action brought by the appellee against the appellant to recover rents alleged to be due her under the terms of a written contract.

The first and second specifications of error in the assignment of errors in this court, call in question the sufficiency of the complaint.' The contract sued on, it is insisted by counsel for appellee, is void for the following reasons: First, ‘ ‘ For the reason that no particular real estate is described therein.” Second, “Because it does not designate any time within which drilling shall be commenced, and consequently, when renting shall accrue, nor…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Grusenmeyer v. City of LogansportIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Cluck v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Bennett v. MattinglyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Hays v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Johnson v. JouchertIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Elliott v. NelsonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Heller v. DaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Edmonds v. MounseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. CurlessIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Warner v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API